Many
of the organizations in the world today have employees who are willing and do
give more than what is required from them. This is the level of motivation that
is needed in any organization and this is the kind of motivation which cannot
be exchanged in terms of monetary consideration (LaPorta, P, 2003).
Employees
need a reason and a motivation to engage in their work and this was addressed
in the following manner: People need motivation, inspiration, a sense of
belonging, something to believe in, a purpose and mainly a sense of comfort in
all they do. They not only need this factor at their homes but also at their
places of work and organizations that in fact address these factors are
recognized as employee friendly and humane organizations (Chang R, 2001).
Employee
engagement is relatively a new topic that needed recognition spanning not longer
than close to two decades ago in the field of Human Resource Management as per
writings of (Maben, West, and
Robinson. 2005). It could be characterized as the feelings of
commitment, passion and energy which could result in increased innovation and
effort, high levels of effort along with tendency to take initiatives to do a
task ad exceeding expectations (Dickson, 2011).
The
founding father of employee engagement William Kahn (1990) defines employee
engagement as “the harnessing of organization members’ selves to their work
roles; in engagement, people employ and express themselves physically,
cognitively, and emotionally during role performances”. Robinson et al. (2004)
define employee engagement as “a positive attitude held by the employee towards
the organization and its value. An engaged employee is aware of business
context, and works with colleagues to improve performance within the job for
the benefit of the organization. The organization must work to develop and
nurture engagement, which requires a two-way relationship between employer and
employee.
It
is further understood that the terms ‘job satisfaction’, ‘motivation’ and
‘commitment’ are generally being replaced now in business by ‘engagement’
because it appears to have more descriptive force and face validity (Reilly and
Brown, 2008).
Employee
engagement has 3 core components as stated by Alfes et al (2010):
1. Intellectual engagement – thinking hard about the job and how to do it better;
2. Affective engagement – feeling positively about doing a good job;
3. Social engagement – actively taking opportunities to discuss work-related improvements with others at work.
Further on another note engagement is said to have 3 overlapping components.
1. Motivation
2. Commitment
3. Organizational Citizenship Behaviour
2. Affective engagement – feeling positively about doing a good job;
3. Social engagement – actively taking opportunities to discuss work-related improvements with others at work.
Further on another note engagement is said to have 3 overlapping components.
1. Motivation
2. Commitment
3. Organizational Citizenship Behaviour
Exhibit
1.1: The IES Model of Employee Engagement
Source: Armstrong et al (2010)
The
exhibit illustrates the model that has been produced by the Institute of
Employment Studies and presented in the above figure as the IES model of
employee engagement.
Rich,
Lepine, and Crawford (2010) state that, employees who are engaged display
higher performance by putting more cognitive, emotional and physicals energy
into their work. Moreover, these employees are more focused, work as a
team, connected, and moreover satisfied with what they do as a part of
their job role.
Application:
An
employee who is engaged can always be motivated to come up with new ideas.
These ideas can be innovative to generate more profits or to reduce the cost
involved. In a company that is always used to using printed documents an
engaged employee could come up with an initiative to go Green and reduce
printing documents. This in the long run benefits the company in the cost
factor.
An
employee coming up with an efficient mechanism or a procedure to streamline a
process is an employee with increased engagement.
References:
Alfes,
K, Truss, C, Soane, E C, Rees, C and Gatenby, M (2010) Creating an Engaged Workforce, London, CIPD
Armstrong,
M, Brown, D and Reilly, P (2010) Evidence
Based Reward Management, London, Kogan Page
Chang
R, (2001) The Passion - Plan at Work –
Building a Passion Driven Organization – Jossey – Bass
Dickson
D, (2011) Fostering Employee Engagement –
Practical Tools and Best Practice Techniques – HRD Press, Inc.
Kahn, W (1990) - Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work, -
Academy of management journal 33, 692-724
LaPorta,
P (2003) – Ignite the Passion – A Guide
to motivational Leadership – Bloomington – USA.
Rafferty
A. M., Maben J., West E., and Robinson D. (2005) - What makes a good employer? Issue Paper 3 International Council of
Nurses Geneva
Reilly,
P and Brown, D (2008) Employee engagement:
future focus or fashionable fad for reward management? World at Work Journal,
17 (4), pp 37–49
Rich, B., Lepine, J. and Crawford, E. (2010). Job Engagement: Antecedents and Effects on
Job Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), pp.617-635.
Robinson
D., Perryman S., and Hayday S. (2004). The
Drivers of Employee Engagement Report 408, Institute for Employment
Studies, UK

Agree on your views. In addition, Employee Engagement (EE) attributes may differ from organization to organization and may depend on the attributes of the business profiles (Choudhury and Mohanty, 2018). According to Dhanya and Prashath (2019), EE reflects the level of employee loyalty and the extent of job satisfaction which is directly impact on both individuals and organizational performances.
ReplyDeleteAgreed with you Nathasha, According to Zeng and Han (2005) employee engagement as having a long-lasting, positive emotional and motivational state of awakening their work, ready to devote themselves to work at any time and are accompanied by pleasant, proud, and encouraging experiences during work.
ReplyDeleteAgree on your views, According to The Corporate Leadership Council (2004) the extent to which employees commit to something or someone in their organisation, how hard they work and how long they stay as a result of that commitment.
ReplyDeleteAgreed with your view, in addition to this all are living in uncertain business environment and complexity, to overcome these context and make organization more success, organization should take steps for engagement, further engaged employees understand the objective of the organization, self-motivated, positive mindset and deliver beyond the expected level (Michael Armstrong, 2009).
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely Natasha. According to Evans & Lindsay (2012) when it comes to employee productivity, engaged employees are more productive & achieve the expected quality level with minimum mistakes, fewer accidents and good safety records.
ReplyDeleteAgree with you Natasha, Mullins (2010) mentioned in his book that De Vita suggests that after the cost-cutting and downsizing of the 1990s, how we feel about work is becoming the prime concern of a growing number of companies. Employee engagement should not be written off as just another HR fad but neither should it be viewed as a quick fix. Engagement relates to the core of a business – its values, culture and way of managing, and changing that is a tall order. But a truly engaged company is likely to be a ‘great’ one.
ReplyDeleteAgreed with you Natasha. Employee engagement has a major impact on both, staff per-formance and overall organisation performance. Factors affectingthe level of engagement vary depending on the age of the work-ers. These differences should be recognised by the organisationand taken into account when increasing workers’engagement (Horvathova, Mikusova, & Kashi, 2019).
ReplyDelete